Thread (7 messages) flat view 7 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: t5801-remote-helpers.sh fails

From: Torsten Bögershausen <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:55:19
Subsystem: the rest · Maintainer: Linus Torvalds

On 10.11.12 23:05, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Torsten Bögershausen [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 11/10/2012 08:15 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
quoted
Hi,

On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Torsten Bögershausen [off-list ref]
wrote:
quoted
on peff/pu t5801 fails, the error is in git-remote-testgit, please see
below.

That's on my Mac OS X box.

I haven't digged further into the test case, but it looks as if
"[-+]A  make NAMEs associative arrays"
is not supported on this version of bash.
/Torsten


/Users/tb/projects/git/git.peff/git-remote-testgit: line 64: declare: -A:
invalid option
declare: usage: declare [-afFirtx] [-p] [name[=value] ...]
/Users/tb/projects/git/git.peff/git-remote-testgit: line 66:
refs/heads/master: division by 0 (error token is "/master")
error: fast-export died of signal 13
fatal: Error while running fast-export

What is your bash --version?
 bash --version
GNU bash, version 3.2.48(1)-release (x86_64-apple-darwin10.0)
Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
I see, that version indeed doesn't have associative arrays.
quoted
On the other hand, Documentation/CodingGuidelines says:
  - No shell arrays.
Yeah, for shell code I guess, but this is bash code.
quoted
Could we use perl to have arrays?
I think the code in perl would be harder to follow, and this is meant
not only as a test, but also as a reference.

I'm not exactly sure what we should do here:

a) remove the code (would not be so good as a reference)
b) enable the code conditionally based on the version of bash (harder to read)
c) replace the code without associative arrays (will be much more
complicated and ugly)
d) add a check for the bash version to the top of the test in t/

I'm leaning towards d), followed by b).

If only there was a clean way to do this, so c) would not be so ugly.

After investigating different optins this seems to be the best:

	join -e empty -o '0 1.2 2.2' -a 2 <(echo "$before") <(echo "$after")
| while read e a b; do
		test "$a" == "$b" && continue
		echo "changed $e"
	done

But to me seems a bit harder to grasp. Not sure.

Cheers.
Hi again,
I managed to have a working solution for
"d) add a check for the bash version to the top of the test in t/"
Please see diff below.

This unbreaks the test suite here.
Is this a good way forward?

Filipe, does the code line you mention above work for you?

If yes: I can test it here, if you send it as a patch.

/Torsten


diff --git a/t/t5801-remote-helpers.sh b/t/t5801-remote-helpers.sh
old mode 100644
new mode 100755
index 6e4e078..ea3d0f3
--- a/t/t5801-remote-helpers.sh
+++ b/t/t5801-remote-helpers.sh
@@ -13,6 +13,15 @@ compare_refs() {
        test_cmp expect actual
 }
 
+cat >"testbashArray" <<-EOF
+  declare -A assa
+EOF
+
+/bin/bash testbashArray || {
+       skip_all='t5801. /bin/bash does not handle associative arrays'
+       test_done
+}
+
 test_expect_success 'setup repository' '
        git init server &&
        (cd server &&
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help