Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCHv2 8/8] send-email: do not prompt for explicit repo ident

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:55:18

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 09:17:30PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
...
quoted
OK.  Tentatively I replaced your old series with these 8 patches
including the last one, as I tend to agree with the value the
earlier clean-up in the series gives us in the longer term.  As you
and Felipe discussed, we may want to replace the last one with a
simpler "don't bother asking" patch, but I think that is more or
less an orthogonal issue.
I'm not sure how orthogonal it is. The latter half of my series is about
exposing the user_ident_sufficiently_given() flag. If we go with
Felipe's patch, then that exposed information has no users, and it may
not be worth it (OTOH, it's possible that some third-party script may
want it).
Oh, no, you are correct.  I shouldn't have said "the last one", but
instead "the later ones".  The first two we should definitely keep,
at least, but the other three are not so clear.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help