Thread (12 messages) flat view 12 messages, 6 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: Local clones aka forks disk size optimization

From: Javier Domingo <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:55:17

Hi Andrew,

Doing this would require I got tracked which one comes from which. So
it would imply some logic (and db) over it. With the hardlinking way,
it wouldn't require anything. The idea is that you don't have to do
anything else in the server.

I understand that it would be imposible to do it for windows users
(but using cygwin), but for *nix ones yes...
Javier Domingo


2012/11/15 Andrew Ardill [off-list ref]:
On 15 November 2012 11:40, Javier Domingo [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi Andrew,

The problem about that, is that if I want to delete the first repo, I
will loose objects... Or does that repack also hard-link the objects
in other repos? I don't want to accidentally loose data, so it would
be nice that althought avoided to repack things, it would also
hardlink them.
Hi Javier, check out the section below the one I linked earlier:
quoted
How to stop sharing objects between repositories?

To copy the shared objects into the local repository, repack without the -l flag

git repack -a

Then remove the pointer to the alternate object store

rm .git/objects/info/alternates

(If the repository is edited between the two steps, it could become corrupted
when the alternates file is removed. If you're unsure, you can use git fsck to
check for corruption. If things go wrong, you can always recover by replacing
the alternates file and starting over).
Regards,

Andrew Ardill
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help