On 10/30/2012 07:23 PM, Ramsay Jones wrote:
[...]
Just to be clear, this is true for the MinGW port to Windows, but *not*
the cygwin port.
[...]
ditto
Thanks for clarifying these points. It seems like this patch series is
not going to be usable (because of fears that it might cause performance
degradation in some as-yet-unexplained scenarios), but if that situation
seems to change then I will incorporate your corrections.
Michael
--
Michael Haggerty
mhagger@alum.mit.edu
http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/