Thread (18 messages) flat view 18 messages, 6 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH] test-lib: avoid full path to store test results

From: Felipe Contreras <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:55:09

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Jonathan Nieder [off-list ref] wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote:
quoted
It's all fun and games to write explanations for things, but it's not
that easy when you want those explanations to be actually true, and
corrent--you have to spend time to make sure of that.
That's why it's useful for the patch submitter to write them, asking
for help when necessary.

As a bonus, it helps reviewers understand the effect of the patch.
Bugs averted!
Yeah, that would be nice. Too bad I don't have that information, and
have _zero_ motivation to go and get it for you.
[...]
quoted
Either way, if obvious fixes that are one-liners require an essay for
you, I give up.
I guess it is fair to call a reasonable subject line plus a couple of
sentences an essay.  Yes, obvious fixes especially require that, since
the bug caused by an obvious fix is one of the worst kinds.
Yes, I've written essays for one-line fixes, in the Linux kernel,
where details matter, and things are not so obvious.

This is not the case here. This is as obvious and simple as things
get. If there was a problem with it, somebody would have found it by
now.

Let not the perfect be the enemy of the good. Or do. Up to you.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help