Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] fast-export: don't handle uninteresting refs

Felipe Contreras wrote:

Well, that's what we have now, and you want to preserve this "feature"
(aka bug), right?

Nope.  I just don't want regressions, and found a patch description
that did nothing to explain to the reader how it avoids regressions
more than a little disturbing.

I also think the proposed behavior is wrong.

I don't think there's much benefit to be gained from continuing to
discuss this.  Consider it a single data point: I would be deeply
worried if this patch were applied without at least a clearer
description of the change in behavior.  Maybe I'm the only one!

Hope that helps,
Jonathan