Thread (12 messages) flat view 12 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Teach --recursive to submodule sync

From: Jens Lehmann <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:55:07

Am 26.10.2012 19:55, schrieb Phil Hord:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Phil Hord [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Yes, thanks for catching that.  I think I should add a test for that
except I notice that sync doesn't take any other flags useful for passing.
Which, of course, suggests that I should not add this
flag-propagating-machinery to submodule-sync at all. yes?
Nope, the new --recursive option has to be passed on!

To catch that bug in your test you'd need another submodule inside your
sub-submodule. The first level submodule is initialized by sync anyways,
the sub-submodule is initialized by the --recursive logic you added but
the sub-sub-submodule would not have been synced because the option was
dropped. I really can't blame you for not adding that third level of
submodules ;-)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help