Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] tests: use __gitcompadd to simplify completion tests
From: Felipe Contreras <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:55:03
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:50 PM, SZEDER Gábor [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 05:52:50PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:quoted
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <redacted> --- t/t9902-completion.sh | 29 +++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)diff --git a/t/t9902-completion.sh b/t/t9902-completion.sh index 92d7eb4..49c6eb4 100755 --- a/t/t9902-completion.sh +++ b/t/t9902-completion.sh@@ -39,19 +39,18 @@ _get_comp_words_by_ref () done } -print_comp () +__gitcompadd () { - local IFS=$'\n' - echo "${COMPREPLY[*]}" > out + compgen -P "${2-}" -S "${4- }" -W "$1" -- "${3-$cur}" > out }Please don't. Running compgen is a fundamental part of the completion script, therefore tests must run it as it is in the completion script and not some copy of it.
All right. I added this patch as an after though to help sell the idea of __gitcompadd. Either way I'm not to worried about overriding it, we are not really exercising any code that could catch issues with calling compgen; we probably need specialized tests for that. In fact I amended the quote you are quoting above as it's totally different from the proposed __gitcompadd, but it still works nonetheless. -- Felipe Contreras