Re: Test failure: Test #3 in t1304-default-acl
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:54:47
Matthieu Moy [off-list ref] writes:
quoted hunk
Ramkumar Ramachandra [off-list ref] writes:quoted
Hi again, Matthieu Moy wrote:quoted
Does this user have the same UID as your usual user (id kseygold; id $LOGNAME)?Yes. What do you propose we do about the test?On a GNU system, something like this should do the trick: ... but it seems FreeBSD's getfacl doesn't have --numeric (http://www.unix.com/man-page/FreeBSD/1/getfacl/), so to be portable, we need some more surgery, like this:--- a/t/t1304-default-acl.sh +++ b/t/t1304-default-acl.sh@@ -33,7 +33,10 @@ check_perms_and_acl () { test -r "$1" && getfacl "$1" > actual && grep -q "user:root:rwx" actual && - grep -q "user:${LOGNAME}:rwx" actual && + grep "user:.*:rwx" actual | grep -v 'user:root:' | \ + cut -d : -f 2 | xargs id -u > acl-uid && + id -u > actual-uid && + test_cmp acl-uid actual-uid && egrep "mask::?r--" actual > /dev/null 2>&1 && grep -q "group::---" actual || false }Can you check that this second patch fixes your problem? I'm a bit hesitant to submit it to git.git, as I find it a bit too hacky. What do other people think?
I haven't been paying attention, but does that mean on that system, a total stranger kseygold can write, modify, and remove whatever Ram owns? I am hoping that is not the case.