(off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
Re: GC of alternate object store · Junio C Hamano <hidden> · 2016-06-15
[PATCH] fetch --all: pass --tags/--no-tags through to each remote · Dan Johnson <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: [PATCH] fetch --all: pass --tags/--no-tags through to each remote · Jeff King <hidden> · 2016-06-15
[PATCH 1/2] argv-array: add pop function · Jeff King <hidden> · 2016-06-15
[PATCH 2/2] fetch: use argv_array instead of hand-building arrays · Jeff King <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: [PATCH 2/2] fetch: use argv_array instead of hand-building arrays · Jens Lehmann <hidden> · 2016-06-15
[PATCH] submodule: use argv_array instead of hand-building arrays · Jens Lehmann <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: [PATCH] fetch --all: pass --tags/--no-tags through to each remote · Jeff King <hidden> · 2016-06-15
[PATCH 3/2] argv-array: fix bogus cast when freeing array · Jeff King <hidden> · 2016-06-15
[PATCHv2] fetch --all: pass --tags/--no-tags through to each remote · Dan Johnson <hidden> · 2016-06-15

Re: GC of alternate object store

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:54:37

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

2016-06-15 · Re: GC of alternate object store · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
2016-06-15 · Re: GC of alternate object store · Oswald Buddenhagen <hidden>
2016-06-15 · Re: GC of alternate object store · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
2016-06-15 · Re: GC of alternate object store · Oswald Buddenhagen <hidden>
2016-06-15 · Re: GC of alternate object store · Dan Johnson <hidden>

Dan Johnson [off-list ref] writes:

I believe that is bad interaction with "--all" (probably a bug). If I
am remembering correctly, --no-tags is internally a per-remote
setting, so I'm guessing it's not getting set on all remotes here.

I'll look into this more a bit later tonight. Does fetch --no-tags
work when you specify a remote?

Thanks.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help