Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
Thomas Rast [off-list ref] writes:
> But then the new description is wrong. It claims that children are
> always before parents, which is not true in the face of clock skew.
Thanks for sanity-check. Here is an updated one.
[...]
---topo-order::
+--date-order::
+ Show no parents before all of its children are shown, but
+ otherwise show commits in the commit timestamp order.
- This option makes them appear in topological order (i.e.
- descendant commits are shown before their parents).
+--topo-order::
+ Show no parents before all of its children are shown, and
+ avoid showing commits on multiple lines of history
+ intermixed.
Ack, thanks.
--
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch