Re: [PATCH] rev-list docs: clarify --topo-order description

Thomas Rast [off-list ref] writes:

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Thomas Rast [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

So the --topo-order switch *ensures* that we process commits in
topological order even in the face of skewed clocks.

Yes, I *think* that I attempted to show with the illustration.

But then the new description is wrong.  It claims that children are
always before parents, which is not true in the face of clock skew.

Ah, you are talking about the "even without this option" part.
Yeah, that does not hold true.