Re: [PATCH] help: correct behavior for is_executable on Windows
From: Heiko Voigt <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:54:28
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 09:30:06PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Heiko Voigt [off-list ref] writes:quoted
help.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/help.c b/help.c index 662349d..b41fa21 100644 --- a/help.c +++ b/help.c@@ -103,10 +103,19 @@ static int is_executable(const char *name) return 0; #if defined(WIN32) || defined(__CYGWIN__) + /* On Windows we cannot use the executable bit. The executable + * state is determined by extension only. We do this first + * because with virus scanners opening an executeable for + * reading is potentially expensive. + */ + if (has_extension(name, ".exe")) + return S_IXUSR; + #if defined(__CYGWIN__) if ((st.st_mode & S_IXUSR) == 0) #endif -{ /* cannot trust the executable bit, peek into the file instead */ +{ /* now that we know it does not have an executable extension, + peek into the file instead */ char buf[3] = { 0 }; int n; int fd = open(name, O_RDONLY);@@ -114,8 +123,8 @@ if ((st.st_mode & S_IXUSR) == 0) if (fd >= 0) { n = read(fd, buf, 2); if (n == 2) - /* DOS executables start with "MZ" */ - if (!strcmp(buf, "#!") || !strcmp(buf, "MZ")) + /* look for a she-bang */ + if (!strcmp(buf, "#!")) st.st_mode |= S_IXUSR; close(fd); }Would it make sense to move this to compat/win32/, compat/cygwin.c, and compat/posix.c, each exporting is_executable(const char *path), so that we do not have to suffer the #ifdef mess?
Yes that makes sense. But that means I need to test the code on multiple
platforms. To ease the merge in msysgit (the patch is already applied there)
I would suggest to post a follow up patch which would split up the function
into the platform specific parts.
Since the code for cygwin and windows in general is almost the same I would
extract one function for them where I leave in one ifdef for cygwin.
E.g. like this:
static int is_executable(const char *name)
{
struct stat st;
if (stat(name, &st) || /* stat, not lstat */
!S_ISREG(st.st_mode))
return 0;
fill_platform_stat(name, &st);
return st.st_mode & S_IXUSR;
}
which I could then define to a no op on posix. That way we avoid code
duplication in the platform specific functions.
What do you think?
Cheers Heiko