Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 5 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH] tests: Introduce test_seq

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:54:25

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 01:53:15PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Wouldn't it be cleaner and readable to write it like this

	"$PERL_PATH" -le 'print for $ARGV[0]..$ARGV[1]' "$1" "$2"

by the way?
Yeah, that would be more robust (it's longer to type, which is why I
avoided it in the inline replacement, but since we're factoring it out,
that's not an issue).

-Peff
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help