Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 07:49:47AM +0000, Michał Kiedrowicz wrote:
quoted
Jeff King <peff <at> peff.net> writes:
quoted
- for i in $(seq 1 $GIT_PERF_REPEAT_COUNT); do
+ for i in $("$PERL_PATH" -le "print for 1..$GIT_PERF_REPEAT_COUNT"); do
Maybe you could introduce "test_seq" instead.
I don't have a strong preference, as there are only two callsites. Do
you want to make a patch?
If you run "for . in . . ." in t/, we see quite a many hits, so
"only two callsites" might be undercounting the candidates.