Thread (3 messages) flat view 3 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH 0/2] test results for v1.7.12-rc0 on cygwin

From: René Scharfe <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:54:22

Am 28.07.2012 20:46, schrieb Ramsay Jones:
Unfortunately, I was unable to reproduce the final failure in t7810-grep.sh.
I tried, among other things, to provoke a failure thus:

     $ for i in $(seq 100); do
     > if ! ./t7810-grep.sh -i -v; then
     >     break;
     > fi
     > done
     $

but, apart from chewing on the cpu for about 50 minutes, it didn't result
in a failure. :(

However, after looking at test 59, it seems to me to be a stale (redundant)
test. So, patch #2 removes that test! :-D [I wish I could reproduce the
failure because I don't like not knowing why it failed, but ...]
Removing the test makes sense, since it was needed for --ext-grep only, 
is relatively expensive and a bit fragile (by depending on MAXARGS).

I'm slightly worried about the non-reproducible failure, though. 
Perhaps a timing issue is involved and chances are higher if you leave 
out the option -v?

Thanks,
René
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help