Thread (15 messages) flat view 15 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] i18n: am: mark more strings for translation

From: Jonathan Nieder <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:54:20

Jiang Xin wrote:
Mark strings in 'git-am.sh' for translation. In the last chunk, I
changed '$1' to '-b/--binary' for this reason:

 * First, if there is a variable in the l10n message, we could not use
   gettext. Because the variable will be expanded (evaluated) and will
   never match the entry in the po file.

 * Second, if there is a positional parameter ($1, $2,...) in the
   message, we could not use eval_gettext either. Because
   eval_gettext may be a wapper for gettext, and the positional
   parameter would loose it's original context.
Yes, I think it's a good change.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- a/git-am.sh
+++ b/git-am.sh
[...]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -387,8 +386,8 @@ do
 	-i|--interactive)
 		interactive=t ;;
 	-b|--binary)
-		echo >&2 "The $1 option has been a no-op for long time, and"
-		echo >&2 "it will be removed. Please do not use it anymore."
+		echo >&2 $(gettext "The -b/--binary option has been a no-op for long time, and
+it will be removed. Please do not use it anymore.")
Could this be simplified to

		gettextln >&2 'The -b/--binary option...
... any more.'

or

		gettextln 'The -b/--binary option ...
... any more.' >&2

or would that confuse xgettext?  That would be more comforting than "echo"
because if the translated string includes backslashes then the behavior of
echo can be unpredictable.

Sorry I missed that last time.

The rest is indeed
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <redacted>

Thanks.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help