Re: [PATCH 1/3] retain reflogs for deleted refs

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:

I noticed I ignored the "discover" and "delete" parts of your paragraph.
As far as deletion goes, I think we can ignore it; expiring all entries
is equivalent.
...
In other words, I want to focus on getting the ref-level plumbing right,
and then we can care about the porcelain later.

Yeah, I agree that is a reasonable way forward.  for-each-ref with a
new option (--include-dead or something) can wait.