Jonathan Nieder [off-list ref] writes:
Hi,
Quick first impressions:
Anders Kaseorg wrote:
quoted
Sidestep this problem by opening the backflow FIFO once for
read+write.
Is that portable?
If you mean [n]<>word, it probably is, even though it is somewhat
unusual and I wouldn't be surprised if implementations get wrong.
quoted
Also, replace the stream FIFO with a shell pipe so we
don’t have to do manual process management.
Doesn't this mean we wouldn't notice if test-svn-fe crashes?
Very good point.