nguyenhu@minatec.inpg.fr wrote:
Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] a écrit :
quoted
quoted
+char *mkpathdup(const char *fmt, ...)
+{
+ char path[PATH_MAX];
+ va_list args;
+ unsigned len;
+
+ va_start(args, fmt);
+ len = vsnprintf(path, sizeof(path), fmt, args);
+ va_end(args);
+ if (len >= sizeof(path))
+ return xstrdup(bad_path);
+ return xstrdup(cleanup_path(path));
+}
Hrmph. If a new helper is introduced anyway, wouldn't it be a better
idea to get rid of the hardcoded PATH_MAX limitation, perhaps using
strbuf_vaddf() or something in the implementation of this function?
Ramsay Jones, what do you think about this ?
I think that I'm sorry for the late reply, I've been away ... :-D
I noticed your new series (v7 I think) which looked good (as far as the
mkpathdup() implementation is concerned) and I don't think it will tickle
the cygwin bug. (I haven't actually fetched that mail yet, I've only read
it using my ISPs web-mail interface, but will do so soon and test it on
cygwin).
Thanks!
ATB,
Ramsay Jones