quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Thomas Adam [off-list ref] writes:
This assertion is not only wrong, it's just ludicrous. The intended
functionality has a statement of intent with regards to its functionality --
and as a user of cvs2git, I'd not want to lose *any* of that functionality.
Don't be stupid with this. Please.
My needs would be satisfied with an command-line option that removes the
limit, while keeping the status quo unaffected if it's not used. How does
that sound?
John