Re: [PATCH] pager: drop "wait for output to run less" hack
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:53:59
Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 02:56:28AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:quoted
quoted
+static int fd_to_close; +void close_fd_prexec_cb(void) +{ + if(debug) + fprintf(stderr, "close_fd_prexec_cb closing %d\n", fd_to_close); + close(fd_to_close); +}Note that preexec_cb does not work at all on Windows, as it assumes a forking model (rather than a spawn, which leaves no room to execute arbitrary code in the child). If all you want to do is open an extra pipe, then probably run-command should be extended to handle this (though I have no idea how complex that would be for the Windows side of things, it is at least _possible_, as opposed to preexec_cb, which will never be possible).I'm really tempted to do this:
Why (I am slower than my usual slow self today, so pardon me)? Aren't these already protected with "ifndef WIN32"?
-- >8 -- Commit 35ce862 (pager: Work around window resizing bug in 'less', 2007-01-24) causes git's pager sub-process to wait to receive input after forking but before exec-ing the pager. To handle this, run-command had to grow a "pre-exec callback" feature. Unfortunately, this feature does not work at all on Windows (where we do not fork), and interacts poorly with run-command's parent notification system. Its use should be discouraged. The bug in less was fixed in version 406, which was released in June 2007. It is probably safe at this point to remove our workaround. That lets us rip out the preexec_cb feature entirely.
Ah, OK.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <redacted> --- I checked, and even RHEL5 is on less 436. So besides people on antique "I installed less from source more than 5 years ago" systems, my only concern would be that some other pager depends on this hack in a weird way. But I have never heard of such a thing, so...
Hrm...
quoted hunk
pager.c | 18 ------------------ run-command.c | 10 ---------- run-command.h | 1 - 3 files changed, 29 deletions(-)diff --git a/pager.c b/pager.c index 4dcb08d..c0b4387 100644 --- a/pager.c +++ b/pager.c@@ -11,21 +11,6 @@ * something different on Windows. */ -#ifndef WIN32 -static void pager_preexec(void) -{ - /* - * Work around bug in "less" by not starting it until we - * have real input - */ - fd_set in; - - FD_ZERO(&in); - FD_SET(0, &in); - select(1, &in, NULL, &in, NULL); -} -#endif - static const char *pager_argv[] = { NULL, NULL }; static struct child_process pager_process;@@ -93,9 +78,6 @@ void setup_pager(void) static const char *env[] = { "LESS=FRSX", NULL }; pager_process.env = env; } -#ifndef WIN32 - pager_process.preexec_cb = pager_preexec; -#endif if (start_command(&pager_process)) return;diff --git a/run-command.c b/run-command.c index 606791d..dff28a7 100644 --- a/run-command.c +++ b/run-command.c@@ -394,16 +394,6 @@ fail_pipe: unsetenv(*cmd->env); } } - if (cmd->preexec_cb) { - /* - * We cannot predict what the pre-exec callback does. - * Forgo parent notification. - */ - close(child_notifier); - child_notifier = -1; - - cmd->preexec_cb(); - } if (cmd->git_cmd) { execv_git_cmd(cmd->argv); } else if (cmd->use_shell) {diff --git a/run-command.h b/run-command.h index 44f7d2b..850c638 100644 --- a/run-command.h +++ b/run-command.h@@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ struct child_process { unsigned stdout_to_stderr:1; unsigned use_shell:1; unsigned clean_on_exit:1; - void (*preexec_cb)(void); }; int start_command(struct child_process *);