Re: [PATCH] Reduce cost of deletion in levenstein distance (4 -> 3)
From: Matthieu Moy <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:53:56
Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
Lack of objections is never a good reason to assume it is a good change.
The other reason I forgot to mention is "I've lived with this patch and my fat fingers for a few weeks, and didn't find weird cases". But my fingers are not _that_ fat, and not necessarily representative ;-). -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/