Re: [PATCHv2] Do not autosquash in case of an implied interactive rebase

Vincent van Ravesteijn [off-list ref] writes:

Or did you mean that you want to imply "--interactive" when
"--autosquash" is explicitly given ?

Come to think of it, it might have been a saner UI design when
f59baa5 (rebase -i --autosquash: auto-squash commits, 2009-12-08)
added this option, but if we want to go that route, we do need to
address the concerns I raised in my response.

But as things stand, i.e. with --autosquash that does not imply -i,
your patch is good.

Thanks.