Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] wt-status: better advices for git status

Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy [off-list ref] writes:

Nice. Although git-status is sometimes too heavy I avoid it. But I
like this. I don't know, it might help if this info could be printed
alone, maybe with an option, without the actual status stuff (changed,
cached, others...).

Once this is implemented as a "git status" addition, we may want to add
a "git status --very-short" (or find a better naming) to show only the
header of the status.

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/