Re: [PATCH v4] git-svn: clarify the referent of dcommit's optional argument

The documentation of the dcommit subcommand is reworded to clarify that
the optional argument refers to a git branch, not an SVN branch.

The discussion of the optional argument is put into its own paragraph
as is the guidance about using 'dcommit' in preference to 'set-tree'.

The section on REBASE vs. PULL/MERGE is reworded to incorporate the
advice to prefer 'git rebase' previously in the description of 'dcommit'.

Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <redacted>
---
 Documentation/git-svn.txt | 40 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

Restore original meaning that pull/merge causes issues specifically
with set-tree A..B (not with set-tree A, in general).

diff --git a/Documentation/git-svn.txt b/Documentation/git-svn.txt
index 34ee785..4384ed9 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-svn.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-svn.txt

@@ -189,18 +189,16 @@ and have no uncommitted changes.

       last fetched commit from the upstream SVN.

 'dcommit'::
-       Commit each diff from a specified head directly to the SVN
+       Commit each diff from the current branch directly to the SVN
       repository, and then rebase or reset (depending on whether or
       not there is a diff between SVN and head).  This will create
       a revision in SVN for each commit in git.
-       It is recommended that you run 'git svn' fetch and rebase (not
-       pull or merge) your commits against the latest changes in the
-       SVN repository.
-       An optional revision or branch argument may be specified, and
-       causes 'git svn' to do all work on that revision/branch
-       instead of HEAD.
-       This is advantageous over 'set-tree' (below) because it produces
-       cleaner, more linear history.
++
+When an optional git branch name (or a git commit object name)
+is specified as an argument, the subcommand works on the specified
+branch, not on the current branch.
++
+Use of 'dcommit' is preferred to 'set-tree' (below).
 +
 --no-rebase;;
       After committing, do not rebase or reset.

@@ -800,18 +798,18 @@ have each person clone that repository with 'git clone':

 REBASE VS. PULL/MERGE
 ---------------------
-
-Originally, 'git svn' recommended that the 'remotes/git-svn' branch be
-pulled or merged from.  This is because the author favored
-`git svn set-tree B` to commit a single head rather than the
-`git svn set-tree A..B` notation to commit multiple commits.
-
-If you use `git svn set-tree A..B` to commit several diffs and you do
-not have the latest remotes/git-svn merged into my-branch, you should
-use `git svn rebase` to update your work branch instead of `git pull` or
-`git merge`.  `pull`/`merge` can cause non-linear history to be flattened
-when committing into SVN, which can lead to merge commits reversing
-previous commits in SVN.
+Prefer to use 'git svn rebase' or 'git rebase', rather than
+'git pull' or 'git merge' to synchronize unintegrated commits with a 'git svn'
+branch. Doing so will keep the history of unintegrated commits linear with
+respect to the upstream SVN repository and allow the use of the preferred
+'git svn dcommit' subcommand to push unintegrated commits back into SVN.
+
+Originally, 'git svn' recommended that developers pulled or merged from
+the 'git svn' branch.  This was because the author favored `git svn set-tree B`
+to commit a single head rather than the `git svn set-tree A..B` notation to
+commit multiple commits. Use of 'git pull' or 'git merge' with `git svn set-tree A...B`