Re: What's cooking in git.git (May 2012, #02; Fri, 4)

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:

Ah, OK. I thought the progression you used was topic->pu->next->maint.
Did that used to be the case, or am I just crazy?

I may have done that in the past, but I think the current arrangement
makes more sense in order to keep 'maint' really stale^Wstable.  The
process improvement happens ;-).