Re: [PATCH de.po 5/5] de.po: collection of suggestions
flat view
From: Christian Stimming <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:53:43
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [PATCH de.po 5/5] de.po: collection of suggestions · Thomas Rast <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [PATCH de.po 5/5] de.po: collection of suggestions · Thomas Rast <hidden>
As one of the earlier translators: I agree with most of those as well. Thanks a lot. However, one small remark: Am Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2012, 15:49:27 schrieb Thomas Rast:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -676,11 +675,11 @@ msgstr "hinter " #: wt-status.c:908 wt-status.c:911 msgid "ahead " -msgstr "über " +msgstr "weiter: " #: wt-status.c:913 msgid ", behind " -msgstr ", hinter " +msgstr ", zurückgefallen " #: builtin/add.c:62 #, c-format@@ -903,12 +902,12 @@ msgstr "Zweig '%s' zeigt auf keine Version" #: builtin/branch.c:396 #, c-format msgid "behind %d] " -msgstr "hinter %d] " +msgstr "%d hinterher] " #: builtin/branch.c:398 #, c-format msgid "ahead %d] " -msgstr "vor %d] " +msgstr "%d voraus] "
In the above hunk, you said "ahead = weiter" and "behind = zurückgefallen", but now you say "ahead = voraus" and "behind = hinterher". Is it helpful to use two different translations, or shouldn't those rather be chosen identically? The second set sounds somewhat better to me, but the more important question is whether both hunks should use the same translations. Best Regards, Christian