Am 26.04.2012 00:03, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
I however wonder if we can name "next" a bit better, but cannot come up
with a good name. It is the location that holds the pointer to the new
tail element if we append one. Some places may call it "tail" but that
gives a wrong impression that it points at the element at the end.
Perhaps tail_next? And it's perhaps a good idea to include it in the
struct instead of letting callers maintain it separately.
René