Re: What's cooking (incremental)

Thomas Rast [off-list ref] writes:

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

I've merged the following topics to 'next':

  * tr/xdiff-fast-hash (2012-04-09) 1 commit
  * cb/daemon-test-race-fix (2012-04-19) 1 commit
  * ld/git-p4-tags-and-labels (2012-04-24) 6 commits
  * nh/empty-rebase (2012-04-24) 4 commits
  * pw/t5800-import-race-fix (2012-04-24) 1 commit
  * nd/i18n (2012-04-24) 10 commits

Some of them are scary and somewhat iffy (I had to apply a last minute
fix and rebuild 'next' to one of them), so please test them throughly to
help us avoid breakages on 'master'.

Umm, which one?

As the author of the first, I'm kind of curious whether I need to
scramble to fix (or at least further test) something :-)

Authors do not need to "scramble"; they are trusted to have done as good
a job as they can possibly do before submitting anyway.

It is sufficient to just use the resulting Git in your daily work, but
paying extra attention to notice if there is any behaviour that feels
strange.