Re: [PATCH v2] completion: add new git_complete helper

Felipe Contreras wrote:

I took your argument seriously and looked for evidence myself, and in
the absence of evidence I'm still not throwing it away, I'm assuming
it has merit and added code to make sure we don't override some user
function that has the same name. That would solve the problem you
raised

Ah.  All that talking, but I was not addressing your actual point.

I though you didn't believe that the namespace adopted by the
bash_completion project was "identifiers starting with underscore,
plus a few old identifiers that have been grandfathered in".

But in fact, you just don't like namespace conventions.

Now I'm exhausted so I have no time to explain why a project that
involves implicitly including scripts from a wide variety of authors
into a flat namespace shared with others might end up using a
convention to manage that namespace.  But at least the world seems a
little saner.  Sorry for the wasted time.

Please, next time just say what you mean instead of leaving me talking
about something irrelevant.