Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
Felipe Contreras [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Do I need to resend the patch?
Not necessarily. If you can eyeball what is queued on 'pu' and gave me an
Ack (or send a replacement with "You stupid, you amended it wrong!") that
should be sufficient.
Actually, can we have a follow-up patch to add in-code comment before the
_get_comp_words_by_ref shell function in t9902 to explain why the test
overrides this implementation detail? The script being tested will need
to maintain _some_ invariants that is expected by this hack in order to
keep the test working (or this hack needs to be updated when the updates
to the completion script need to break the invariants), but without any
explanation on what the invariants are, it is making it hard to others to
update the completion script.
Thanks.