Re: rs/commit-list-sort-in-batch
From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:53:29
Subsystem:
the rest · Maintainer:
Linus Torvalds
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 03:27:24AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 02:02:56PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:quoted
* rs/commit-list-sort-in-batch (2012-04-02) 3 commits - revision: insert unsorted, then sort in prepare_revision_walk() - commit: use mergesort() in commit_list_sort_by_date() - add mergesort() for linked listsLooks like you applied these patches right on v1.7.9. However, they need Thomas's 5e8617f to compile, which comes later. There's no textual conflict, but test-mergesort.c need strbuf_getwholeline_fd, which is made public by 5e8617f.
By the way, building on top of René's patches[1], I was able to drop the
time of a particular fetch into a repository with many refs from:
real 0m2.081s
user 0m2.180s
sys 0m0.712s
to:
real 0m1.784s
user 0m1.936s
sys 0m0.652s
with this patch:
diff --git a/builtin/fetch-pack.c b/builtin/fetch-pack.c
index 7124c4b..5d80e65 100644
--- a/builtin/fetch-pack.c
+++ b/builtin/fetch-pack.c@@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ static int mark_complete(const char *refname, const unsigned char *sha1, int fla struct commit *commit = (struct commit *)o; if (!(commit->object.flags & COMPLETE)) { commit->object.flags |= COMPLETE; - commit_list_insert_by_date(commit, &complete); + commit_list_insert(commit, &complete); } } return 0;
@@ -615,6 +615,7 @@ static int everything_local(struct ref **refs, int nr_match, char **match) if (!args.depth) { for_each_ref(mark_complete, NULL); for_each_alternate_ref(mark_alternate_complete, NULL); + commit_list_sort_by_date(&complete); if (cutoff) mark_recent_complete_commits(cutoff); }
I'm not sure if that vindicates the patches, or implies that these
things are lurking everywhere and that we should really move to a better
data structure so we don't have to fix them all manually. :)
-Peff
[1] Actually, it was René's patches merged into v1.7.10. My ccdc603
(parse_object: try internal cache before reading object db,
2012-01-05) makes such a huge difference it is not worth timing
without it.