Re: [PATCH 2/2] git: continue alias lookup on EACCES errors
From: Frans Klaver <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:53:25
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:15:25 +0200, Jeff King [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 01:16:47PM +0200, Frans Klaver wrote:quoted
quoted
Yes, we can differentiate after the fact. Though I think it ends up being almost the same code as just implementing execvp in the first place.It will, but doesn't stock execv*() also provide access to shell builtins? If that's the case then I wouldn't be bothered by the extra bit of code we need to understand what execvp has been doing. I think it would be sane to keep sane_execvp a wrapper instead of a reimplementation.No, definitely not. Handling builtins is the responsibility of the shell, not of execvp. It is responsible for falling back to "/bin/sh $file" if execve returns ENOEXEC. Anyway, I think the last round I posted is good enough. It is approaching execvp in complexity, but it is still a little bit simpler. And because it's on the error code path, if we are incompatible the worst thing we can screw up is the error message, not the actual exec.
Good. In that case I think this last looks good, indeed. Frans