Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] gitweb: refactor If-Modified-Since handling
From: Jakub Narebski <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:53:24
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, W. Trevor King wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:24:20PM +0100, Jakub Narebski wrote:quoted
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012, W. Trevor King wrote:quoted
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------- +# modification times (Last-Modified and If-Modified-Since) + +test_expect_success 'modification: feed last-modified' ' + gitweb_run "p=.git;a=atom;h=master" && + grep "Status: 200 OK" gitweb.output && + grep "Last-modified: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 22:14:13 +0000" gitweb.output +'All right. What's that date from? Wouldn't it be better to read it from commit object with `git show -s --pretty=%cD HEAD` or postprocessed from '%ct' timestamp?That's the date set by the first `test_tick`, which is hardcoded in `test-lib-functions.sh`. Extracting the date dynamically seems unnecessary, since I can't imagine anyone changing the `test_tick` date.
Ah, it's all right then. I should have checked the test_tick function. That of course assuming that nobody would add test_tick earlier, but if he/she does, he/she can deal with fallout...
It's easy enough to do if you think it is appropriate though…
No, it is not needed.
quoted
quoted
+test_debug 'cat gitweb.headers' + +test_expect_success 'modification: feed if-modified-since (modified)' ' + export HTTP_IF_MODIFIED_SINCE="Wed, 6 Apr 2005 22:14:13 +0000" && + gitweb_run "p=.git;a=atom;h=master" && + unset HTTP_IF_MODIFIED_SINCE && + grep "Status: 200 OK" gitweb.output +'I think it *might* be better solution to use test_when_finished: +test_expect_success 'modification: feed if-modified-since (modified)' ' + export HTTP_IF_MODIFIED_SINCE="Wed, 6 Apr 2005 22:14:13 +0000" && + test_when_finished "unset HTTP_IF_MODIFIED_SINCE" && + gitweb_run "p=.git;a=atom;h=master" && + grep "Status: 200 OK" gitweb.output +' I don't think we need sane_unset here.Good point. Sloppy me not reading `t/README` thoroughly enough ;).
-- Jakub Narebski Poland