Re: GSoC - Designing a faster index format
From: elton sky <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:53:23
Thanks Shawn,
Or use LevelDb[2]. Its BSD license. Uses an immutable file format, but writes updates to new smaller files and eventually collapses everything back together into a bigger file. This can be a dramatically simpler approach than dealing with your own free block system inside of a single file. Its only real downside is needing to periodically pay a penalty to rewrite the whole index. But this rewrite is going to be faster than the time it takes to rewrite the pack files for the same repository, which git gc or git repack handles. So I don't think its actually a problem for the index. You might even be able to take a two level approach to compacting the LevelDb database (or something like it). In a minor compaction you compact all of the files except the huge base file, leaving you with 2 files. A huge base file that contains the first tree the user checked out, and a second smaller file containing any differences they have since the initial checkout (this may just be updated stat data for a handful of files that differed across two branches as they switched back and forth). During a git gc or git repack, add a new stage to collapse the base file and everything else into a single new base file as a major compaction. [2] http://code.google.com/p/leveldb/
I don't know leveldb, but like to have a look. Just realize this solution is kinda popular. HDFS also uses the similar image file with edit file format for its file block index.