Johan Herland [off-list ref] writes:
... The patch
below looks good to me, and should become patch #3 in this series,
with my "3/2" patch being adjusted accordingly and becoming patch #4.
Do you want me to send the whole series again, or is it easier for you
to simply fix it up yourself?
I'd rather not to do this myself, as this alleged #3 in v2 was written
merely as a response to the "refactoring dir.c:remove_dir_recursively is
ugly", without reading other parts of the patch (i.e. the logic you use to
decide when to call this function with what arguments) at all.
Thanks.