Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] Demonstrate a bug in --word-diff where diff.*.wordregex is "sticky"

On 03/14/2012 08:50 PM, Johannes Sixt wrote:

The test case applies a custom wordRegex to one file in a diff, and expects
that the default word splitting applies to the second file in the diff.
But the custom wordRegex is also incorrectly used for the second file.

Helped-by: Thomas Rast [off-list ref]
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <redacted>
---
Changes in this round, where I do not resend 2/3 and 3/3:

- Use test_unconfig.
- Use compare_diff_patch to check the result.
- Fix a broken && chain at the end of the last test.
- Name the files a.tex and z.tex as per your suggestion.

But Junio suggested using 'z.txt' (not 'z.tex'); quoting his last message:

  The use of files "a" and "z" as an example of pair of a tex and non tex
  input makes the test look overly artificial (why not a.tex vs z.txt or
  something?), but other than that, looks cleanly done.

Regards,
  Stefano