Re: [PATCH] archive: fix archive generation for empty trees

Am 08.03.2012 08:15, schrieb Jeff King:

On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 10:38:07PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted

quoted

... However, prefix_pathspec does a lot of magic parsing;
it's unclear to me whether this is all in support of properly
adding the prefix, or if its side effects are important.

These "magic" are for things like :(root)/path that will explicitly
refuse the prefix when run from a subdirectory.

Yeah, that was my impression. In that case, I would think we could get
rid of the get_pathspec call entirely, as it is purely about fixing-up
prefixes, and we know that we have none.

Yes, I think you're right.  Not sure why I didn't do that in ebfbdb34, 
when that empty prefix was introduced instead.

René