Ramsay Jones wrote:
Jakub Narebski wrote:
quoted
quoted
This patch solves the problem for me when using a regex search
(re checkbox checked), but *not* for a non-regex search.
If you have a leading '*' or '+', in the non-regex case, then you
still get the above complaint (and xml error page etc.), although
the line number has changed slightly from that given above.
Ramsay, please provide those line number in the future, together with
line and if possible some context.
Yeah, sorry about that; when I wrote that I didn't have the information
readily available (I would have had to shutdown Windows, boot Linux, ...)
and I was about to go out.
You could have told us _that_...
So, the choice was to wait about 24hrs to report
with full info, or provide the feedback earlier; I chose the latter. ;-)
That's understandable.
Thanks again for reporting these issues.
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland