Re: A possible fmt-merge-msg update?

On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:

The attached would give me:

So this isn't interesting to me.

Authorship is less relevant than submaintainership. So I'm more
interested in *committer* information than authorship information.

Of course, since you do it in branches that you maintain, to you
committer information is pointless. But I pull from submaintainers,
and then it really is the committer part that is way more relevant.

                          Linus