Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
Both of your changes seem to have broken indentation to use 8-SP at
the beginning of some (but not all) lines instead 1-HT. I'll queue
a fixed up version and push the result out in 'pu' later, so please
double check to make sure I didn't screw up.
Right. This is because you flagged an indentation issue with the
previous version of the patch. I think what happened is that the
previous version included the 1-HT (what is HT - half-tab?) spacing but
it "looked funny" with the additional "+" from the diff line.
So in some way this was deliberate to make the patch look better. I
have no problem with you (or me!) changing it back.
Thanks for taking these up!
-Dave