Re: [PATCH 3/4] t5510: ensure we stay in the toplevel test dir

Thomas Rast [off-list ref] writes:

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Thomas Rast [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

The last test descended into a subdir without ever re-emerging, which
is not so nice to the next test writer.

True.  Making the test suite more robust like this patch does is very much
appreciated.

Is there a reason why we shouldn't be sticking to the more usual

	mkdir dups &&
        (
        	cd dups &&
                do whatever in dups
	)

pattern?

None in particular.  It would also perhaps reduce the churn since (as it
touches every line anyway) it could be squashed with 2/4.  Should I reroll?

I was just curious.

But it does sound like squashing the two may make sense.  I can manage
locally.

Thanks.