Re: git-subtree Ready #2

greened@obbligato.org (David A. Greene) writes:

Avery Pennarun [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Should we filter-branch or rebase the history first, or just leave it as is?

Like I said, since I don't expect there to be any more back-and-forth
development, rebasing should be pretty harmless.

Catching up on e-mail.  :)

I'm happy to do either (rebase or filter-branch).  Just let me know.

I would understand Avery's "should we filter-branch/rebase, or is it OK
as-is?", but I do not understand what you mean by "either rebase or
filter-branch is fine".

I'm about the send the test-lib.sh patch separately...

Thanks, this I understand and should not be a part of git-subtree topic.