Re: [FYI] very large text files and their problems.
From: Ian Kumlien <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:53:08
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 06:14:46PM +0700, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Ian Kumlien [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
I'm uncertain if you got my reply since i did it out of bounds - so i'll repeat myself - sorry... =)yes I received it, just too busy this week.
Ah good, you never know what anti-spam measures people applies these days... =) And i have the same, so i totally understand.
quoted
quoted
quoted
git needs to have atleast the same ammount of memory as the largest file free... Couldn't this be worked around? On a (32 bit) machine with 4GB memory - results in: fatal: Out of memory, malloc failed (tried to allocate 3310214313 bytes) (and i see how this could be a problem, but couldn't it be mitigated? or is it bydesign and intended behaviour?)I think that it's delta resolving that hogs all your memory. If your files are smaller than 512M, try lower core.bigFileThreshold. The topic jc/split-blob, which stores a big file are several smaller pieces, might solve your problem. Unfortunately the topic is not complete yet.Well, in this case it's just stream unpacking gzip data to disk, i understand if delta would be a problem... But wouldn't delta be a problem in the sence of <size_of_change>+<size_of_subdata>+<result> ? Ie, if the file is mmapped - it shouldn't have to be allocated, right?We should not delta large files. I was worried that the large file check could go wrong, But I guess your blob's not deltified in this case.
That would be correct
When you receive a pack during a clone, the pack is streamed to index-pack, not mmapped, and index-pack checks every object in there in uncompressed form. I think I have found a way to avoid allocating that much. Need some more check, then send out.
Ah! That explains alot - do you have a publicly available version i could look at?
-- Duy