Re: [PATCHv2 1/4] refs: add common refname_match_patterns()
From: Tom Grennan <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:53:03
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 08:12:54AM +0100, Michael Haggerty wrote:
On 02/11/2012 03:16 AM, Tom Grennan wrote:quoted
diff --git a/refs.h b/refs.h index 00ba1e2..13015ba 100644 --- a/refs.h +++ b/refs.h@@ -152,4 +152,12 @@ int update_ref(const char *action, const char *refname, const unsigned char *sha1, const unsigned char *oldval, int flags, enum action_on_err onerr); +/** + * Returns: + * 1 with NULL patterns + * 0 if refname fnmatch()es any ! prefaced pattern + * 1 if refname fnmatch()es any pattern + */ +extern int refname_match_patterns(const char **patterns, const char *refname); + #endif /* REFS_H */This comment is unclear and incomplete. 1. What does "NULL patterns" mean? Your code fails if patterns==NULL, so I guess you mean "1 if there are no patterns in the list". 2. Since the three conditions are not mutually exclusive, you should say how they are connected. I believe that you want something like "A otherwise B otherwise C". 3. You haven't specified what happens if refname matches neither a !-prefixed pattern nor a non-!-prefixed pattern. Does this behavior depend on which types of patterns were present in the list? I see that you have described the behavior more completely in the commit message for patch 2/4, but the commit message is not enough: this behavior should be described precisely in both code comments (when the function is defined) and in the user documentation (when the functionality is added to a command).
Yes, I didn't explicitly state that the precedence is the order written and in correctly described the first case. How about? /** * Returns in highest to lowest precedence: * 1 with an empty patterns list * 0 if refname fnmatch()es any ^ prefaced pattern * 1 if refname fnmatch()es any other pattern * 0 otherwise */ Thanks, TomG