Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
I believe that would work in your case, but it seems like the most
correct thing would actually be:
{ "", "/.git", ".git" }
That is:
1. Try the literal path the user gave as a repo
2. Otherwise, try it as the root of a working tree (containing .git)
3. Otherwise, assume they were too lazy to type ".git" and include it
That sounds sensible, together with this, to which I agree with:
One way of dealing with that would be to make get_repo_path a little
more robust by only selecting paths which actually look like git
directories.
... but ...
quoted hunk
diff --git a/builtin/clone.c b/builtin/clone.c
index 9084feb..0fbbae9 100644
--- a/builtin/clone.c
+++ b/builtin/clone.c
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ static const char *argv_submodule[] = {
static char *get_repo_path(const char *repo, int *is_bundle)
{
- static char *suffix[] = { "/.git", ".git", "" };
+ static char *suffix[] = { "/.git", "", ".git" };
... this does not match that simple and clear guideline.
Shouldn't this simply be { "", "/.git", ".git" }?
quoted hunk
diff --git a/path.c b/path.c
index b6f71d1..1ca6567 100644
--- a/path.c
+++ b/path.c
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ const char *enter_repo(const char *path, int strict)
if (!strict) {
static const char *suffix[] = {
- ".git/.git", "/.git", ".git", "", NULL,
+ "/.git", "", ".git/.git", ".git", NULL,
};
Neither does this.
Shouldn't this be { "", "/.git", ".git", ".git/.git", NULL }?
I must be missing something from your description...