On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 07:12:03PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
That makes my head hurt and makes me suspect there is something
fundamentally wrong in the patch. Sigh...
I'll need to think about it. In the meantime perhaps the following
bandage patch would suffice, rather than revert 2f88c19 (diff-index:
pass pathspec down to unpack-trees machinery)
-- 8< --
Subject: [PATCH] diff-index: enable recursive pathspec matching in unpack_trees
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <redacted>
---
diff-lib.c | 2 ++
t/t4010-diff-pathspec.sh | 8 ++++++++
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/diff-lib.c b/diff-lib.c
index 62f4cd9..fc0dff3 100644
--- a/diff-lib.c
+++ b/diff-lib.c
@@ -469,6 +469,8 @@ static int diff_cache(struct rev_info *revs,
opts.src_index = &the_index;
opts.dst_index = NULL;
opts.pathspec = &revs->diffopt.pathspec;
+ opts.pathspec->recursive = 1;
+ opts.pathspec->max_depth = -1;
init_tree_desc(&t, tree->buffer, tree->size);
return unpack_trees(1, &t, &opts);
diff --git a/t/t4010-diff-pathspec.sh b/t/t4010-diff-pathspec.sh
index fbc8cd8..af5134b 100755
--- a/t/t4010-diff-pathspec.sh
+++ b/t/t4010-diff-pathspec.sh
@@ -48,6 +48,14 @@ test_expect_success \
compare_diff_raw current expected'
cat >expected <<\EOF
+:100644 100644 766498d93a4b06057a8e49d23f4068f1170ff38f 0a41e115ab61be0328a19b29f18cdcb49338d516 M path1/file1
+EOF
+test_expect_success \
+ '"*file1" should show path1/file1' \
+ 'git diff-index --cached $tree -- "*file1" >current &&
+ compare_diff_raw current expected'
+
+cat >expected <<\EOF
:100644 100644 766498d93a4b06057a8e49d23f4068f1170ff38f 0a41e115ab61be0328a19b29f18cdcb49338d516 M file0
EOF
test_expect_success \--
1.7.8.36.g69ee2
-- 8< --
--
Duy