Re: [PATCH] gitignore: warn about pointless syntax
From: Jan Engelhardt <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:52:45
On Tuesday 2012-01-10 08:01, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
quoted
You can either adjust the people, i.e. teach that their "false" assumption is wrong and the feature they expect is available but not in a way that they expect. Or you can adjust the tool to match their expectation. [...]in real life, people are harder to train than tools[...]Though, having one more way to do things leads to a certain mess at a later point, if such mess is not already present. I am thinking here of the precedent iptables option parser set by removing support for exclamation marks in odd positions, as it was redundant ("more than 1 way"), was only supported by ~45% of all options and had to be explicitly invoked at every callsite - so in fact was harder on users than git would be for **. There were a few mails by people who could not seem to read error messages, but overall, within 6-9 months, everything was quiet again. So, that's the empiric result of what teaching-the-tool would do.
~ teaching-the-user would entail - it's factually problemfree.