Thomas Jarosch [off-list ref] writes:
May be Scott Chacon can provide you commit access to git-scm.com ;)
If you are interested in this of course.
For example wikipedia lists git-scm.com as website for git.
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Git_%28software%29)
No, thanks.
They volunteered to keep the site up to date and useful to the user
community and they have been doing a good job at it, and that is why we
advertise git-scm.com as the official site. A minor bug like this which I
know they are perfectly capable of fixing at their site is not a
justifiable incident to trigger taking control and credit over from them.